11 March 2026
Chicago 12, Melborne City, USA
Economy

Who Will Win in Every Category 

After what seems like a full year of talking about these films, the time has come to make predictions for the winners of the 98th Oscars. For a while, on paper at least, it has appeared to be a fairly easy year to predict. Virtually all the endless precursor awards settled on One Battle After Another until Sinners shook up the race at the very last minute (halfway through actual Oscar voting) at last week’s Actor Awards, and suddenly some were declaring the race had opened up. Other than Best Actress, the acting races also appeared fluid going into final balloting.

RELATED: Oscar Nominations 2026: ‘Sinners’ Leads With Record 16, ‘One Battle’ 13

But the real wild card, as I have been writing, is a new Academy stipulation that voters must attest they have seen all the nominees in a category before voting. Although this is largely on an honesty basis, there are technical additions to the ballot that may have complicated the process for voters. You have to click that you have seen a film if not already given credit on the Academy’s digital screening room.

RELATED: How To Watch The Oscars Online & On TV

Anytime there is new technology there can be problems, and I have heard for some there were. One voter who first chose to vote for International Feature Film told me their entire ballot shut down with a “Thank you for voting.” Calling the helpline, the Academy member apologized for bothering and said the IT person told them they weren’t alone, and the helpline has been very “busy” with others experiencing similar problems as well as other glitches. This voter had to get their ballot restored in order to vote in the remainder of the categories and told me they never could have figured it out on their own. In the end, bugs and all, everyone wanting to vote got to vote.

RELATED: Where To Watch The 2026 Oscar Contenders, From ‘Sinners’ To ‘Sentimental Value’

Still, the new rule requiring “proof” or at least personal attestment to watching the films clearly has been intimidating for some, adding more pressure than usual, based on my informal surveys, and perhaps resulting in a smaller number of voters this year among the 10,000-plus eligible pool. The Academy never comments on numbers, but at a dinner the other night with a couple of members, one stunned me by saying they weren’t voting at all. This member had always dutifully participated for decades, even been involved in the campaigns, but this year confessed they just hadn’t seen enough so decided to skip it entirely rather than just vote for what they had seen. The other member though had watched everything, even the shorts, and was a model voter. I talked with a few who even mentioned the names of films they were running out of time to see; Hamnet and Sentimental Value came up more than once.

After my column headlined “Can Oscar Voters Be Trusted” ran, I got some interesting responses, none more so than the following email from a past major-category Oscar-nominated filmmaker:

“Hi, Pete, I enjoy your articles.
I thought you might be interested to hear a take from an Academy member about this year’s rules. I haven’t seen even half of the nominated films, nor do I care to, because my time is far too valuable to spend watching movies I know I’d never vote for (much less be able to sit through). I found most of the films I did see to be mediocre, and nothing that I nominated made the final cut. Therefore, since I don’t want to lie, I decided I simply would not vote at all this year. Yes, I’d like to vote for K-Pop Demon Hunters, but not at the price of watching four other movies I know won’t be as good. But really, the Oscars have become pretty irrelevant. Anora? CODAEverything Everywhere All At Once? vs The Godfather, Lawrence of Arabia, Patton? Which three movies will people still be watching five years from now? It’s all about the film, not the award. Rather than watch the Awards, I’ll probably watch Singin’ In The Rain or North By Northwest or The Searchers – REAL best pictures which weren’t even nominated.
Feel free to quote me, but please don’t use my name.”

All of this is to preface the below predictions with a grain of salt, as it were. The various “brutally honest” ballots shared online have indicated some members who did vote were liberally skipping categories (most notably the short films) or choosing not to vote in others, because they haven’t seen all the nominees. It will be fascinating to see if this admirable attempt by the Academy to try and ensure members were seeing the movies before voting for them actually affects the outcome — especially in terms of turnout, as the new rules only apply to final voting, not nomination rounds. This new wrinkle certainly adds a level of suspense and further unease for those of us tasked with the annual prediction game.

So below are my predictions, not necessarily my choices if I had a ballot (I don’t) but just where I think the winds are blowing. Feel free to use them for your Oscar betting pools but, as I always say, don’t sue me if you lose.

First Appeared on
Source link

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video