4 March 2026
Chicago 12, Melborne City, USA

Unconditional US military aid to Israel ‘enabled a genocide in Gaza’, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says – live | Trump administration

Ocasio-Cortez says unconditional US military aid to Israel ‘enabled a genocide in Gaza’

At a Munich security conference panel which just concluded, Hagar Shezaf of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz asked Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez if she thinks “the Democratic presidential candidate in the 2028 elections should re-evaluate military aid to Israel”.

“To me this isn’t just about a presidential election,” Ocasio-Cortez replied, “personally, I think that the United States has an obligation to uphold its own laws, particularly the Leahy laws.

“I think that, personally, the idea of completely unconditional aid, no matter what one does, does not make sense,” she added. “I think it enabled a genocide in Gaza, and I think that we have thousands of women and children dead … that was completely avoidable.

“So I believe that enforcement of our own laws, through the Leahy laws, which requires conditioning aid in any circumstance when you see gross human rights violations is appropriate,” Ocasio-Cortez concluded.

The Leahy laws are two statutory provisions, named for the former senator Patrick Leahy who introduced them in the 1990s, which prohibit the US defense department and state department from providing funds to “units of foreign security forces where there is credible information implicating that unit in the commission of gross violations of human rights”.

But, according to Charles Blaha, the former director of the state department office that leads Leahy vetting of foreign security units, while state “department officials insist that Israeli units are subject to the same vetting standards as units from any other country. Maybe in theory. But in practice, that’s simply not true.”

Share

Updated at 

Key events

As Trump says regime change in Iran ‘would be the best thing’, US military reportedly prepares to attack

As Donald Trump seemed to endorse regime change in Iran, embracing a long-term goal of his ally, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Reuters reports that the US military “is preparing for the possibility of sustained, weeks-long operations” against Iran’s theocratic government.

When Trump was asked on Friday: “Do you want regime change in Iran?” the president replied: “Well, it seems like that would be the best thing that could happen.”

Trump then pointed out that the US had deployed a large force to the region. “We have tremendous power has arrived, and additional power, as you know, another carrier is going out shortly, “ he said.

“If we could get it settled for once and for all, that’d be good,” the president said, after describing casualties Iran’s government was responsible for, without saying where.

Asked, “Who would you want to take over?” Trump said: “I don’t want to talk about that.”

“There are people,” he added.

According to US officials who spoke to Reuters, the US military is preparing for what could become a far more serious conflict than previously seen between the countries.

US and Iranian diplomats held talks in Oman last week in an effort to revive diplomacy over Tehran’s nuclear program, which Trump claimed to have “obliterated” in strikes last year.

During his first term, Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal that barred Iran from making nuclear weapons in exchange for sanctions relief even though his own administration had confirmed that Iran was in compliance.

US officials said on Friday the Pentagon was sending an additional aircraft carrier to the Middle East, adding thousands more troops along with fighter aircraft, guided-missile destroyers and other firepower capable of waging attacks and defending against them.

Trump said in an address to US troops in North Carolina on Friday it had “been difficult to make a deal” with Iran. “Sometimes you have to have fear. That’s the only thing that really will get the situation taken care of,” Trump said.

Ordering an attack on Iran would cut against the opposition to “regime change wars” in the Middle East Trump voiced during his first campaign for the presidency, in 2016.

But his ally Netanyahu has spent decades trying to convince a US president to attack Iran.

In 2002, Netanyahu, who was then between terms as Israel’s prime minister, testified to Congress in support of a US invasion of Iraq, arguing that it would bring about the end of Iran’s theocratic state as well.

“It’s not a question of whether Iraq’s regime should be taken out but when should it be taken out; it’s not a question of whether you’d like to see a regime change in Iran but how to achieve it,” Netanyahu said six months before the Bush administration began the “shock and awe” bombardment of Baghdad.

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region,” Netanyahu said then. “And I think that people sitting right next door in Iran, young people, and many others, will say the time of such regimes, of such despots is gone.”

First Appeared on
Source link

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video